Understanding Behavioural Challenges: A Comprehensive Approach to Identification and Assessment

Introduction

In the realm of clinical psychology and behaviour analysis, understanding the complexities behind behavioural challenges requires a multi-faceted approach. Addressing these challenges necessitates a thorough understanding of both observable behaviours and the underlying psychological, social, and biological factors. This blog is based upon material from Chapter 5:  Individual Factors in Positive Systems Approach:  Identification in the book:  Managing Disruptive Behaviours with a Positive Systems Approach

Click here to see book on Amazon:

https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=managing+disruptive+behaviour+with+a+positive+systems+approach&crid=Y7BBT1G76AF1&sprefix=managing+disrup%2Caps%2C178&ref=nb_sb_ss_pltr-sample-20_1_15. 

This content delves into the importance of identification and assessment, highlighting various perspectives and methodologies that contribute to effective treatment strategies. By examining both immediate behaviours and historical contexts, practitioners can develop comprehensive and effective interventions based upon a Positive Systems Approach.

Defining Identification and Assessment

Identification and assessment are the foundational steps in addressing behavioural challenges. Identification involves defining who the individual is, recognizing their strengths, understanding their needs, and pinpointing areas of their life where problems arise. This process is not limited to current behaviours but extends to understanding the individual’s history, family dynamics, trauma history, and medical considerations.

Assessment goes beyond the present context. It includes a thorough exploration of past experiences, which can reveal patterns and triggers that influence current behaviours. By combining historical insights with present observations, clinicians can develop a holistic view of the individual, which is crucial for effective intervention and support.

Behaviourist vs. Clinical Perspectives

Behaviourists and clinical psychologists can sometimes approach behavioural challenges from different angles. Behaviourists often focus strictly on observable behaviours and the immediate triggers and consequences that influence these behaviours. Their approach is grounded in the principles of applied behaviour analysis, emphasizing the control and manipulation of the current environment to shape desired behaviours. They often argue that understanding an individual’s past is unnecessary and unreliable for effective intervention.

On the other hand, clinical psychologists advocate for a more holistic approach. They believe that an individual's history, including family dynamics, life experiences, and trauma history, is crucial for understanding current behaviours and mental health. By delving into the past, clinicians can identify unresolved traumas, recurring patterns, and coping mechanisms that significantly impact the individual's current well-being. This comprehensive understanding allows for the development of nuanced and empathetic therapeutic approaches tailored to the individual's unique needs.

Medical and Psychological Factors Influencing Behaviour

Behavioural challenges can often be symptomatic of underlying mental health disorders or medical conditions. Understanding these factors is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective intervention.  For instance:

•           Affective Disorders and Aggression: Disorders such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder can increase the risk of aggression, particularly in the context of irritable or dysphoric moods.

•           Bipolar Disorder and Manic Phases: Individuals with Bipolar Disorder may exhibit disinhibition and impulsive behaviours during manic phases, leading to actions that are out of character and potentially risky.

•           Anxiety Disorders and Withdrawal Behaviours: Panic Disorder, Social Phobia, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder can result in avoidance of anxiety-provoking environments or interactions, sometimes leading to aggression or self-injury as coping mechanisms.

•           Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Hyperarousal: PTSD is associated with dissociative phenomena, flashbacks, and hyperarousal, which can increase the risk of aggressive behaviour.

•           Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Compulsive Behaviours: Individuals with OCD, particularly those on the Autism Spectrum, may exhibit aggression when interrupted from completing compulsions.

•           Tourette’s Syndrome and Rage Outbursts: Individuals with Tourette’s Syndrome or Autism Spectrum Disorders may experience rage outbursts, often linked to obsessive-compulsive tendencies and irritability.

 Impact of Medications on Behaviour

While medications are often necessary for treating mental health disorders, they can also introduce side effects that manifest as behavioural symptoms. Understanding these side effects is crucial for comprehensive assessment and intervention.

•           Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Used to treat panic disorder, OCD, social phobia, and bulimia, SSRIs can cause adverse effects such as sexual dysfunction, nausea, vomiting, headache, insomnia, and increased anxiety.

•           Tricyclic Antidepressants: Older medications like Amitriptyline and Imipramine can have multiple influences on neurotransmitters and are generally poorly tolerated in individuals with developmental disabilities. Common side effects include sedation, tremor, constipation, dry mouth, blurred vision, and orthostatic hypotension.

These behavioural manifestations and medication side effects should be viewed as symptoms rather than behavioural excesses that need to be modified. A Positive Systems Approach (PSA) recognizes the importance of identifying these symptoms and treating the underlying issues, whether they are mental health disorders or medication side effects.

Functional Analysis in Behaviour Analysis

Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) shines in conducting thorough functional analyses of behaviours. The goal is to understand the functions of behaviour rather than labeling them as appropriate or inappropriate. For example, if a person seeks attention by acting out, a functional analysis can identify this need and help develop strategies to teach more appropriate ways to gain attention. This approach ensures that the individual’s needs are met while minimizing behaviours that hinder positive growth.

Integration of Positive Systems Approach

The Positive Systems Approach (PSA) integrates biological, social, affective, and environmental factors that influence behaviour. This comprehensive view goes beyond the observable behaviour to address underlying issues that sustain or trigger the behaviour. By focusing on these factors, PSA promotes holistic treatment strategies that encompass the entire spectrum of an individual’s experience.

Case Studies and Practical Applications

Real-world case studies illustrate the application of identification, assessment, and functional analysis. Following are a couple of case studies that demonstrate how intervention strategies can be tailored to individual needs and behaviour functions.

Case Study 1: Addressing Aggressive Behaviour in a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder Due to Interrupted Compulsions

Introduction

This case study explores the journey of Alex, an 8-year-old boy diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), who exhibits aggressive behaviour when his compulsions are interrupted. The study examines the identification and assessment process, the factors influencing Alex's behaviour, the functional analysis conducted, and the intervention strategies implemented to address his aggressive outbursts.

Background Information

Alex is an 8-year-old boy with a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. He attends a specialized school for children with developmental disabilities and lives at home with his parents and younger sister. Alex has a keen interest in building structures with blocks and arranging toys in specific patterns. He demonstrates high intelligence in completing puzzles and building complex structures but struggles with social interactions, communication, and sensory sensitivities.

Identification and Assessment

Initial Concerns

Alex’s parents and teachers have noticed a pattern of aggressive behaviour, including hitting, kicking, and screaming, particularly when his repetitive activities or compulsions are interrupted. These behaviours have increased in frequency and intensity, causing concerns about his safety and the safety of others around him.

Historical Context

A comprehensive assessment begins with gathering information about Alex's developmental history, family dynamics, and past experiences. His parents report that Alex has always been meticulous about his routines and becomes distressed when they are disrupted. They also mention that he had difficulty adjusting to changes in his environment from a young age. Alex’s sensitivity to sensory stimuli, such as loud noises and certain textures, further exacerbates his anxiety and rigidity.

Medical and Psychological Assessment

A thorough medical evaluation rules out any underlying health issues that could contribute to Alex's behaviour. The psychological assessment includes standardized tests to evaluate his cognitive abilities, sensory processing, and emotional regulation. The assessment reveals that Alex has strong visual-spatial skills but significant challenges with flexible thinking and adapting to changes.

Functional Analysis of Behaviour

Purpose

The goal of the functional analysis is to understand the specific triggers and functions of Alex's aggressive behaviour. This involves observing Alex in various settings, interviewing his parents and teachers, and collecting data on the antecedents (what happens before), behaviours (the aggressive actions), and consequences (what happens after).

Observations and Data Collection

1.         Setting: Alex’s aggressive behaviour is most frequently observed at home during transitions between activities and at school during unstructured times.

2.         Antecedents: Triggers include sudden changes in routine, being asked to stop a preferred activity, and interruptions in his repetitive behaviours.

3.         Behaviours: Aggressive actions include hitting, kicking, throwing objects, and screaming.

4.         Consequences: Immediate attention from adults, removal of the demand or interruption, and sometimes being given time alone to calm down.

Hypothesis

The functional analysis suggests that Alex's aggressive behaviour serves two primary functions:

1.         Escape/Avoidance: Alex uses aggression to escape or avoid interruptions and demands that disrupt his compulsive activities.

2.         Attention: Alex's aggressive behaviour also functions to gain attention from adults, who respond immediately to prevent further escalation.

Intervention Plan

Developing a Positive Systems Approach Support Plan

Based on the functional analysis, a comprehensive intervention plan is developed to address the underlying causes of Alex's aggressive behaviour. The plan includes proactive strategies, skill-building activities, and reactive strategies.

1.         Proactive Strategies

•           Structured Environment: Creating a predictable and structured environment to reduce anxiety and the likelihood of sudden changes.

•           Visual Schedules: Using visual schedules to help Alex understand and anticipate transitions, thereby reducing the stress associated with changes in routine.

•           Priming: Informing Alex about upcoming changes in advance to prepare him mentally for transitions.

•           Sensory Breaks: Incorporating regular sensory breaks to help Alex manage sensory overload and maintain emotional regulation.

2.         Skill-Building Activities

•           Alternative Communication: Teaching Alex alternative ways to communicate his needs and feelings, such as using a communication board or simple sign language.

•           Coping Strategies: Helping Alex develop coping strategies for dealing with interruptions, such as deep breathing exercises, squeezing a stress ball, or using a designated calming area.

•           Social Stories: Using social stories to teach Alex about handling changes and interruptions in a socially acceptable manner.

3.         Reactive Strategies

•           Calm and Consistent Responses: Training adults to respond calmly and consistently to aggressive behaviour without reinforcing it. This includes providing minimal attention and using neutral language.

•           Redirection: Redirecting Alex to a preferred activity that is less likely to be interrupted or to a calming activity when he begins to show signs of distress.

•           Positive Reinforcement: Providing positive reinforcement for non-aggressive behaviours and for using appropriate coping strategies.

Implementation and Monitoring

Team Collaboration

The intervention plan is implemented collaboratively by Alex’s parents, teachers, and therapists. Regular meetings are held to review progress, share observations, and adjust strategies as needed.

Data Tracking

Behavioural data is continuously collected to monitor the frequency, duration, and intensity of Alex’s aggressive behaviour. This data helps in assessing the effectiveness of the intervention and making necessary adjustments.

Outcomes and Adjustments

Initial Results

Within the first few weeks of implementing the intervention plan, there is a noticeable reduction in the frequency and intensity of Alex's aggressive outbursts. He responds well to the visual schedules and shows improvement in using alternative communication methods.

Ongoing Challenges

While progress is evident, Alex occasionally struggles with unexpected changes and sensory overload, leading to occasional outbursts. The team continues to refine the intervention plan, introducing new coping strategies and sensory activities to better support Alex.

Long-Term Goals

The long-term goals for Alex include:

1.         Sustained Reduction in Aggressive Behaviour: Achieving a consistent and significant reduction in aggressive outbursts.

2.         Improved Coping Mechanisms: Enhancing Alex’s ability to cope with changes and interruptions without resorting to aggression.

3.         Enhanced Communication Skills: Developing effective communication skills to express needs and emotions appropriately.

4.         Social Integration: Supporting Alex in participating in social activities and interactions with peers in a positive and meaningful way.

Alex's case study highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to identification and assessment in addressing aggressive behaviour in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. By understanding the underlying triggers and functions of his behaviour, the intervention plan can be tailored to his unique needs, promoting positive outcomes and overall well-being. This collaborative and holistic approach underscores the effectiveness of integrating behaviour analysis with clinical psychology to support individuals with developmental challenges.

Case Study 2: Managing Aggressive Outbursts in a Non-Verbal Individual with Developmental Disability and PTSD

Introduction

This case study explores the journey of Sam, a 22-year-old man with a developmental disability who is relatively non-verbal and experiences aggressive outbursts triggered by flashbacks and hyperarousal due to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The study examines the identification and assessment process, the factors influencing Sam's behaviour, the functional analysis conducted, and the intervention strategies implemented to address his aggressive episodes.

Background Information

Sam is a 22-year-old man with a moderate developmental disability and limited verbal communication. He lives in a group home with four other residents and receives support from a team of caregivers. Sam uses a combination of gestures, picture exchange communication systems (PECS), and a few spoken words to communicate. He enjoys activities such as drawing, listening to music, and spending time outdoors. However, Sam has a history of trauma from a childhood incident, which has led to a diagnosis of PTSD. He frequently experiences flashbacks and hyperarousal, resulting in aggressive behaviours such as hitting, biting, and property destruction.

Identification and Assessment

Initial Concerns

Caregivers at the group home have reported an increase in the frequency and intensity of Sam's aggressive outbursts, particularly during transitions and specific times of the day. These behaviours have raised concerns about Sam's safety and the safety of those around him.

Historical Context

A comprehensive assessment begins with gathering detailed information about Sam's trauma history, developmental background, and current living situation. Interviews with Sam’s family, caregivers, and a review of his medical records reveal that Sam witnessed a traumatic event at the age of 7 when his home caught fire. He was trapped in the house for several minutes before being rescued, which has resulted in lasting trauma.

Medical and Psychological Assessment

A thorough medical evaluation ensures there are no underlying health issues contributing to Sam's behaviour. Psychological assessments, tailored to his developmental level, evaluate the severity of his PTSD symptoms, sensory sensitivities, and overall mental health. These assessments confirm that Sam has severe PTSD, characterized by frequent flashbacks, hyperarousal, and avoidance behaviours.

Functional Analysis of Behaviour

Purpose

The goal of the functional analysis is to understand the specific triggers and functions of Sam's aggressive behaviour. This involves observing Sam in various settings, interviewing his caregivers and family, and collecting data on the antecedents (what happens before), behaviours (the aggressive actions), and consequences (what happens after).

Observations and Data Collection

1.         Setting: Sam’s aggressive behaviour is most frequently observed during transitions between activities, when exposed to loud noises, and during interactions with certain staff members.

2.         Antecedents: Triggers include sudden changes in routine, loud noises (e.g., alarms, shouting), and specific times of the day that coincide with the time of the traumatic event.

3.         Behaviours: Aggressive actions include hitting, biting, throwing objects, and self-injurious behaviours such as head banging.

4.         Consequences: Immediate attention and intervention from caregivers, removal from the situation, and sometimes access to a calming activity or space.

Hypothesis

The functional analysis suggests that Sam's aggressive behaviour serves two primary functions:

1.         Escape/Avoidance: Sam uses aggression to escape or avoid situations that trigger memories of the traumatic event.

2.         Sensory Regulation: Aggression functions as a way for Sam to manage overwhelming sensory input and emotional distress during periods of hyperarousal.

Intervention Plan

Developing a Trauma-Informed Treatment Plan

Based on the functional analysis, a comprehensive intervention plan is developed to address the underlying causes of Sam's aggressive behaviour. The plan includes trauma-focused therapy, skill-building activities, and proactive and reactive strategies.

1.         Trauma-Focused Therapy

•           Modified Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Using modified CBT techniques adapted to Sam's developmental level to help him process traumatic memories and reduce anxiety.

•           Sensory Integration Therapy: Addressing Sam's sensory sensitivities through occupational therapy to help him better manage sensory input and reduce hyperarousal.

•           Visual and Social Stories: Creating visual and social stories to help Sam understand and cope with his trauma, using pictures and simple language.

2.         Skill-Building Activities

•           Alternative Communication Methods: Enhancing Sam's communication skills using PECS, gestures, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices to express his needs and emotions.

•           Coping Strategies: Teaching Sam coping strategies such as deep breathing, using a stress ball, or retreating to a designated safe space when feeling overwhelmed.

•           Structured Activities: Providing structured activities that Sam enjoys, such as drawing and listening to music, to reduce anxiety and provide positive outlets for his energy.

3.         Proactive Strategies

•           Predictable Routine: Establishing a consistent daily routine to provide Sam with a sense of stability and reduce the likelihood of unexpected changes.

•           Environmental Modifications: Creating a calm and sensory-friendly environment with minimal triggers, such as using soft lighting, white noise machines, and avoiding loud noises.

•           Safe Spaces: Designating safe spaces where Sam can go to calm down when feeling overwhelmed or triggered.

4.         Reactive Strategies

•           De-escalation Techniques: Training caregivers in de-escalation techniques to safely manage aggressive episodes without reinforcing the behaviour.

•           Calm and Consistent Responses: Ensuring caregivers respond to aggressive behaviour calmly and consistently, using neutral language and minimal attention.

•           Positive Reinforcement: Reinforcing non-aggressive behaviours and the use of coping strategies with praise, rewards, and preferred activities.

Implementation and Monitoring

Team Collaboration

The intervention plan is implemented collaboratively by Sam’s caregivers, therapists, and family. Regular meetings are held to review progress, share observations, and adjust strategies as needed.

Data Tracking

Behavioural data is continuously collected to monitor the frequency, duration, and intensity of Sam’s aggressive behaviour. This data helps in assessing the effectiveness of the intervention and making necessary adjustments.

Outcomes and Adjustments

Initial Results

Within the first few months of implementing the intervention plan, there is a noticeable reduction in the frequency and intensity of Sam's aggressive outbursts. He responds well to the predictable routine and uses his coping strategies more effectively.

Ongoing Challenges

While progress is evident, Sam occasionally struggles with unexpected triggers and new stressors, leading to occasional outbursts. The team continues to refine the intervention plan, introducing new coping strategies and adjusting the trauma-focused therapy as needed.

Long-Term Goals

The long-term goals for Sam include:

1.         Sustained Reduction in Aggressive Behaviour: Achieving a consistent and significant reduction in aggressive outbursts.

2.         Improved Coping Mechanisms: Enhancing Sam’s ability to manage flashbacks and hyperarousal without resorting to aggression.

3.         Enhanced Communication Skills: Developing effective communication skills to express needs and emotions appropriately.

4.         Increased Independence: Supporting Sam in participating in daily activities and social interactions with greater independence and confidence.

Sam's case study highlights the importance of a comprehensive, trauma-informed approach to addressing aggressive behaviour in non-verbal individuals with developmental disabilities and PTSD. By understanding the underlying triggers and functions of his behaviour, the intervention plan can be tailored to his unique needs, promoting positive outcomes and overall well-being. This collaborative and holistic approach underscores the effectiveness of integrating trauma-focused therapy with practical strategies to support individuals with complex developmental and psychological challenges.

Ethical Considerations and Best Practices

Ethical guidelines are paramount in behaviour analysis and clinical psychology. Support plans should always emphasize the importance of informed consent, confidentiality, and the ethical considerations involved in conducting assessments and implementing interventions. The support plan should also emphasize the need for ongoing assessment and adjustment of treatment plans to ensure they remain effective and ethical.

Conclusion

A comprehensive approach to identification and assessment is crucial for understanding and addressing behavioural challenges. By integrating behaviourist principles with clinical psychology’s holistic view, practitioners can develop effective, person-centered interventions that consider both past experiences and present behaviours. This collaborative approach ensures that individuals receive the support they need to achieve positive outcomes and improve their overall well-being.